You'll spend way more time trying to force ACADe to do what you want it to do than you will just drawing with you want with LT. Most of the time I just copy the previous drawing set and change what I need, anyway, so schematics really don't eat up much of my time to begin with. In the end, AutoCAD electrical offered little to no real advantage to me. You are the one who must adjust your drawing standard to fit what AutoCAD Electrical has decreed acceptable.Īll that time I was supposed to save by not having to check my drawings for cross referencing errors was devoured by all that time I had to spend checking my drawings to make sure the automatic cross referencing worked. The bottom line is that AutoCAD Electrical does not adjust to your drawing standard. All you have to do is not do things exactly right and suddenly you'll have wire numbers that won't go over to the next sheet, or you'll have wire number carrying over through a device even though the device is clearly breaking the network and should generate a new number, and component cross references that won't update. Finally, it's really easy to break the links for component and wire cross referencing.
Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical upgrade#
The upgrade from 2012 to 2013 cost me three days of downtime. It seems like every feature they add breaks 2 or 3. As time has gone on, each successive release of AutoCad Electrical has become more bloated, more buggy, and slower. Wire references are also unidirectional, which sucks when you want to use PLC addresses for wire numbers and have to reference "backwards" to previous sheets or else it won't work.
Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical plus#
Plus (and this is my BIG gripe), Autodesk is using Microsoft Access as it's database structure. Plus, if you want, say, a central schematic and component database and screen menu so all of your users are referencing the same parts, you have to hack a number of files to get it to work. You can do it, but it's very tedious and time consuming.
Let's say you want to add a symbol for a new component. I've never used E-Plan, but ACADe is a very " you will do things OUR way" kind of program. The main difference between ACADe and E-Plan is that ACADe is AutoCAD with a bunch of hack-and-slash lisp routines on top of it, and E-Plan was built from the ground-up as an electrical schematic drawing package. If your company has any kind of standard that deviates from what Autodesk has decided everyone should use, you will spend a LOT of time setting up the new system.
I used AutoCAD Electrical for six years, and honestly, now that I'm back on regular AutoCAD, I see very little advantage to it, especially if you have a block library already built up. I already had AutoCadd skills, so the learning curve for Electrical was much shorter, plus all our drawings were already in AutoCadd format, so I could use our existing library and do the AutoCadd Lisp magic on those drawings.Īll our customers' P&ID drawings are in AutoCadd, so using Electrical would could modify those drawings and return them in AutoCadd format. I found Eplan very expensive and difficult to learn.įor what I could buy for 1 Eplan license, I could buy 2 AutoCadd Electrical Network licenses.
If you are familiar with Autocadd and have a library built up, stick with AutoCadd Electrical.ģ years ago I looked into Eplan vs AutoCadd. Something thats generates drawings, BOM's, panel layout's may be a great tool as we look ahead. We currently use Autocad Lt for our electrical drawing but now are starting to think of the best course for the future. I was wondering if members here could good give me the pros or cons on Eplan.Īlso I had mentioned Autocad Electrical as a possibly alernative but I don't know how it stacks up against Eplan. Our company is thinking out purchasing Eplan.
0 kommentar(er)
